Undeliverable responses
Let's begin with the illustration of the problem with undeliverable responses:
Imagine a situation you are expecting a very important package. The question is: do you release your dogs to prohibit the postman to deliver the parcel? We believe not - you will keep your dogs leashed. The question is, why people don't do the same in case e-mails. Using other words: if you think the e-mail from us is important, please leash your dogs (e.g. anti-spam filters) to allow the postman to deliver it.
Cases where our postman complains about "unleashed dogs" / other problem with delivering our response:
| date | sender | server respond / note |
|---|---|---|
| 22nd Feb 2013 | fae_clpe@xxxxxxxxxx.com.cn and sales3@xxxxxxxxxx.com.cn and sales@xxxxxxxxxx.com.cn |
host mail.xxxxx.sk[11.222.333.44] said: host xxxx.yyy.com.cn[111.222.33.444] said: 550 Does not like recipient,your mail is rejected! (in reply to end of DATA command). |
| 20th Feb 2013 | luscik.martin@xxxxx.sk | host mail.xxxxx.sk[11.222.333.44] said: 554 Mail from xxxxxxx@elnec.com rejected for policy reasons. Nas komentar: Odporucame pouzit menej paranoidny e-mail server. |
| 17th Jul 2012 | Tichy@xxxxxx.cz not joke, the same person |
host mailer.xxxxxx.cz[11.22.333.44] said: 550 5.7.1 Dobry den, Vase zprava byla odmitnuta z duvodu prezence na seznamu RBL spolecnosti SpamCop, www.spamcop.net . Hello, your message was rebuffed because of presence on SpamCop RBL, www.spamcop.net. Nas komentar: ked viac verite SpamComp ako Elnec, nedostanete od Elnec postu. |
| 25th May 2012 | tichy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.cz | host mail.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.cz[111.22.333.444] said: 550 |
| 18th May 2012 | vipah@xxxxxx.cz | host mx50.xxxxxx.cz[11.22.33.44] said: 552 4.2.2 User has full mailbox. Again. And 2012-05-25 too! |
| 16th May 2012 | vipah@xxxxxx.cz | host mx50.xxxxxx.cz[11.22.33.44] said: 552 4.2.2 User has full mailbox. Smart! |
| 31st Mar 2012 | sales3@xxxxxxxxxx.com.cn | mx32.dns.com.cn[119.254.72.172] said: 551 217.198.112.165 is listed in RBL! |
| 9th Jan 2012 | autoxray@xxxxxxx.com | host xxx.yyyyyyy.com[11.22.33.444] said: 550 SC-001 (SNT0-MC1-F46) Unfortunately, messages from 217.198.112.157 weren't sent. |
| 9th Jan 2012 | ono21@xxxxxxx.nl | host xxx.yyyyyyy.com[11.22.33.444] said: 550 SC-001 (SNT0-MC1-F46) Unfortunately, messages from 217.198.112.157 weren't sent. |
| 19th Dec 2011 | chunwe.lai@xxxxxxx-yyy.com | The recipient's e-mail address was not found in the recipient's e-mail system. Microsoft Exchange will not try to redeliver this message for you. |
| 12th Oct 2011 | Helpdesk@xxx.it | 'very smart' host mail.xxxx.it[111.222.333.4] said: 554 Sorry, message looks like SPAM to me (in reply to end of DATA command) |
Notes:
1) If you have found your correctly spelled E-mail address in the list please arrange solving of the problem with your post server / E-mail service provider. After the problem is solved, please contact us and we will be happy to respond to your previous inquiery and to remove your E-mail address from the list.
2) If you have found your incorrectly spelled E-mail address in the list please contact us again with correct E-mail address and we will be happy to respond to your previous inquiery and to remove your incorrectly spelled E-mail address from the list.
