Let's begin with the illustration of the problem with undeliverable responses:
Imagine a situation you are expecting a very important package. The question is: do you release your dogs to prohibit the postman to deliver the parcel? We believe not - you will keep your dogs leashed. The question is, why people don't do the same in case e-mails. Using other words: if you think the e-mail from us is important, please leash your dogs (e.g. anti-spam filters) to allow the postman to deliver it.
Cases where our postman complains about "unleashed dogs" / other problem with delivering our response:
|date||sender||server respond / note|
|23rd Junemail@example.com||host aspmx.x.xxxxxx.com[xx.xxx.x.xx] said: 550-5.1.1 The email account that you tried to reach does not exist.|
|24th Octfirstname.lastname@example.org and
|Message has not been sent. Server reply - 4.1.2
|22nd Febemail@example.com and
|host mail.xxxxx.sk[11.222.333.44] said: host xxxx.yyy.com.cn[220.127.116.114] said: 550
Does not like recipient,your mail is rejected! (in reply to end of DATA command).
|20th Febfirstname.lastname@example.org||host mail.xxxxx.sk[11.222.333.44] said: 554 Mail from email@example.com rejected for policy reasons.
Nas komentar: Odporucame pouzit menej paranoidny e-mail server.
not joke, the same person
|host mailer.xxxxxx.cz[11.22.333.44] said: 550 5.7.1 Dobry den, Vase zprava byla odmitnuta z duvodu prezence na seznamu RBL spolecnosti SpamCop, www.spamcop.net . Hello, your message was rebuffed because of presence on SpamCop RBL, www.spamcop.net.
Nas komentar: ked viac verite SpamComp ako Elnec, nedostanete od Elnec postu.
|25th Mayfirstname.lastname@example.org||host mail.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.cz[111.22.333.444] said: 550|
|18th Mayemail@example.com||host mx50.xxxxxx.cz[18.104.22.168] said: 552 4.2.2 User has full mailbox. Again. And 2012-05-25 too!|
|16th Mayfirstname.lastname@example.org||host mx50.xxxxxx.cz[22.214.171.124] said: 552 4.2.2 User has full mailbox. Smart!|
|31st Maremail@example.com||mx32.dns.com.cn[126.96.36.199] said: 551 188.8.131.52 is listed in RBL!|
|9th Janfirstname.lastname@example.org||host xxx.yyyyyyy.com[184.108.40.2064] said: 550 SC-001 (SNT0-MC1-F46) Unfortunately, messages from 220.127.116.11 weren't sent.|
|9th Janemail@example.com||host xxx.yyyyyyy.com[18.104.22.1684] said: 550 SC-001 (SNT0-MC1-F46) Unfortunately, messages from 22.214.171.124 weren't sent.|
|19th Decfirstname.lastname@example.org||The recipient's e-mail address was not found in the recipient's e-mail system. Microsoft Exchange will not try to redeliver this message for you.|
|12th Oct||Helpdesk@xxx.it||'very smart' host mail.xxxx.it[111.222.333.4] said: 554 Sorry, message looks like SPAM to me (in reply to end of DATA command)|
1) If you have found your correctly spelled E-mail address in the list please arrange solving of the problem with your post server / E-mail service provider. After the problem is solved, please contact us and we will be happy to respond to your previous inquiery and to remove your E-mail address from the list.
2) If you have found your incorrectly spelled E-mail address in the list please contact us again with correct E-mail address and we will be happy to respond to your previous inquiery and to remove your incorrectly spelled E-mail address from the list.